September 2, 2012, 14 Pentecost
Song of Solomon 2:8-13
Springtime Rhapsody
Background: Song of Solomon, also known as Song of
Songs, is a unique type of book in the Bible. This book is explicitly a
description of human love and makes no overt mention of God. The book, like
Proverbs and Ecclesiastes is attributed to Solomon, the archetype of wisdom and
love in Hebrew Scripture.
Theme: This passage appears to be akin to a love
dialog. It can be likened to a dialog between lovers where they are unable to
be together and one lover’s call to the other to come closer. This passage may
also be viewed as a revelation between lovers sharing a childlike and playful
sense of hide-and-seek.
Questions to Ponder
* Skim the entire book of Song of Solomon for context and
tone.
* Why might this book be associated with Solomon?
* Why might a book like Song of Solomon be included
in the Canon of Scripture (those scripture that are included as authoritative
in Jewish and/or Christian perspective)?
* Who do you think the two voices are in this passage; the
first from verse 8 through 10a, the second from 10b through 13?
* How would you describe the imagery of “the beloved” in the
opening portion of the poem? Does the imagery evoke a masculine or feminine
image? Who might the beloved in this section be?
* Do you think it would be probable for the “masculine”
lover to be synonymous with God and the “feminine” beloved to be Israel? If
that were the case how might that affect the interpretation of the passage?
* What might the significance be of the reference to “the
winter being past and the rain is over and gone” in verse 11?
* This passage and the entire book, Song of Solomon,
is often read before Sabbath of the Passover holiday; what might the
significance of this passage be for that setting?
* How might this passage be important for Christians living
in the 21st century? How can this passage help Christians keep an
appropriate connection with God?
* For what purpose might the Song of Solomon be normative
with regard to Christian relationships?
* If this passage is an example of appropriate interpersonal
love, how might it shape our understanding of the “goodness” of the emotional
(sexual, erotic, etc.) relationship of mutual love and affection? Would this
affection apply in all cases not simply to the love of God but also for all God’s
creation?
* How might this passage steer St. John’s in the development of community relations and a definition of ministry in the world?
No comments:
Post a Comment