September 15, 2013 – 17 Pentecost
Jeremiah 4:11-12, 22-28
Invasion and Desolation of Judah Threatened
Sorrow for a Doomed Nation
Background: The book of Jeremiah is
fairly unique as it provides commentary and criticism of the Israelites during
two periods of subjugation interspersed with a period of religious reform.
Jeremiah is a descendent of the Levitical priestly line and was a descendant of
Abiathar. Jeremiah was a supporter of adherence to the law and covenant
relationship over the practice of temple worship – leading to confrontation
with those in charge of Israel’s religious landscape.
Theme: This narrative is
a portion of Jeremiah’s description of God’s accusation against Israel.
Jeremiah focuses on the attack from the north and the ultimate judgment being
meted against the Israelites based on their apostasy. There appears to be
allusion to previous sections of Hebrew scripture and the portrayal of the
present time as the antithesis of God at work in Israel in years past.
Questions to Ponder:
* Read Jeremiah 4:11-28.
* Briefly describe the situation in Israel:
the political, social, and religious dynamics of the nation.
* Who do you think is
speaking in the portions, verses 11-12 and verses 22-28? Do you think the same
person is speaking in both sections?
* Who do you think the
“poor people” are in verse 11? Do you think they are truly financially poor
people or simply emotionally/relationally poor?
* How might winnowing or
cleansing be associated with the “poor people” identified in verse 11? Why
might God want to winnow or cleanse Israel?
* How might a wind be too
strong to winnow or cleanse? For what purpose would God send a wind too strong
to winnow against Israel? What might the function of such a strong wind be?
* Do you think verses
22-28 are presented as a vision (or possible vision) for the future? Why or why
not? How much of the passage do you think is “cut in stone” against Israel?
* How do you think verses
23-26 contrast other passages in the Old Testament? What passages are these
verses reminiscent of?
* In the latter verses,
the destruction envisioned seems to be counter to God’s promise to Noah that he
would not destroy the world again (even discounting the “with a flood”
stipulation). Why might God want to send Israel back to chaos like at creation?
* Some might argue that
verse 27 was a later addition to the passage, like a postscript after the
event. How might the addition of that verse alter the message of the passage?
* What is the statement
of hope for Israel in the midst of the story of destruction in this passage?
* How might we apply this
passage to our life and ministry at St. John’s?
* How do we share this
message as a story of hope today?
No comments:
Post a Comment