May 13, 2012, 6th Sunday of Easter
Acts 10:44-48
Gentiles Receive the Holy Spirit
Background: The Acts of the Apostles continues the
story of Jesus’ life portrayed in the Gospel of Luke. This book emphasizes the
sovereignty of God and the divinity of Jesus; heavy emphasis is placed on tying
all Jesus did to the Old Testament prophets. It has been said that Luke’s
intent was to show the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus were both real
and preordained by God.
Theme: The Apostles continue their work of
spreading the gospel message in new and unheard of places. Peter, being
faithful to his vow to Jesus, does not hesitate to go where he is sent – often to
the chagrin of those leaders in Jerusalem. Peter will continue his eloquent
defense of his actions by citing the presence of the Holy Spirit as the proof
that he is doing the right thing.
Questions to Ponder
* Briefly describe the social and political structure
surrounding this passage.
* How does this passage compare to the passage at Pentecost
(Acts 2:1-13)? What are the similarities and differences between the two
passages?
* What might the significance be of the Holy Spirit
descending while Peter is speaking?
* Why might there be “circumcised believers” with Peter?
What role might they be playing in the exchange that takes place? Why might
their presence be important?
* How might this passage proclaim the favorable response to
the gospel message by the Gentiles? How might this passage highlight God’s
acceptance of the Gentiles as true believers?
* How might this passage lead to Peter’s later trial in
Chapter 11?
* What might the significance be of the Gentile converts’
speaking in tongues be?
* Why might the circumcised members be astonished at the
Gentiles speaking in tongues? Do you think their astonishment was well founded?
* For a time it was argued that behavior was the principle
requirement for belonging to the church (one had to behave properly before they
could become a member of the church) and that belonging would lead to belief.
Do you think this passage supports or refutes that argument? Why or why not?
* What is “odd” about the sequence of events in today’s
passage?
* There is a proposal about an “open table” (allowing any
person, regardless of their status as a baptized Christian to receive bread and
wine at Communion) in the Episcopal Church. How do you think this passage
informs allowing un-baptized people to come to the table as members of the
church?
* What is implied by the Gentiles being baptized “in the
name of Jesus Christ”?
* What might Peter’s staying with the Gentiles “for some
days” imply? What would be most surprising and most troubling to the
circumcised believers and Jews about Peter’s extended presence with the
Gentiles?
No comments:
Post a Comment