May 6, 2012, 5th Sunday of Easter
Acts 8:26-40
Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch
Background: The Acts of the Apostles continues the
story of Jesus’ life portrayed in the Gospel of Luke. This book emphasizes the
sovereignty of God and the divinity of Jesus; heavy emphasis is placed on tying
all Jesus did to the Old Testament prophets. It has been said that Luke’s
intent was to show the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus were both real
and preordained by God.
Theme: In this passage we see indicators of
Christianity’s growth outside Israel and its neighbors. This is one of a
continuing series of call and evangelism stories situated between Stephen’s
martyrdom and Saul’s conversion. Through this passage the author of Acts
continues to define the growth in acceptance and stature of the Christian cult
in the Ancient Near East.
Questions to Ponder
* Review Acts 4:4-25 paying attention to the principals in
action and their presentation of the gospel.
* Briefly describe the social and political situation surrounding
this passage.
* Be familiar with the geographic setting of this story and
the layout of the places named in the passage.
* In verse 26, the phrase “go to the south” could also be
interpreted “go at noon”. What difference would it make with either
interpretation? What other events may have taken place at or about noon in the
book of Acts? Given the specificity of the time, how might that be an indicator
of the Holy Spirit’s interaction with humanity in the growing Christian faith?
* What might the significance of Ethiopia be to this
passage? Why might it be important for the Ethiopian in the passage to be a
member of the queen’s court?
* How might the fact that the Ethiopian in the chariot was a
eunuch impact the conversion that takes place in the passage? How might the
Jews treat or view a eunuch? By what authority would they treat a eunuch in
that manner?
* What might the significance of the eunuch reading from the
prophet Isaiah? What was the history of the passage to the nation of Israel? Do
you think the passage should be redefined by the life of Jesus? How might this
passage point to statements by Jesus in the gospels?
* For what reason do you think the author made it very clear
that the actions in this passage were caused by the Holy Spirit? How might this
support the intent of the author with regard to the empowerment of
Christianity?
* Do you think the reinterpretation of the passage as one pointing
specifically to Christ is helpful for unity in our Christian tradition? How might
scriptural reinterpretation impact ecumenical relationships, especially with
the Jews?
* Do you think the Holy Spirit actually teleported Philip to
Azotus? Where is Caesarea in relation to Azotus and what might the author be
claiming with this passage?
No comments:
Post a Comment